Guilty because I believe you are — A Case of Confirmation Bias
In R. v. Aslami 2021 ONCA 249 the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a very serious case: the firebombing of an occupied residence. The case
In R. v. Aslami 2021 ONCA 249 the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a very serious case: the firebombing of an occupied residence. The case
In Canada the rules of sexual engagement are precise. You cannot have sexual relations with another person without their consent. This means that at every
[1] In certain instances demeanour evidence may fall into the category of “post-offence conduct”, or it may be gathered during testimony to determine credibility. Demeanour
Your browser does not support the video tag.
It’s not a Credibility Contest! [1] We often hear the term used “it’s he said — she said” to explain how a judge will
Don’t Forget about Consent [1] In R. v. Foster 2020 NBCA 2020 the court overturned a sexual assault conviction because the trial judge failed to
Seinfeld Saves the Day [1] In a recent case, R. v. Burgess 2020 ABQB 50, Mr. Burgess was late for his trial regarding some bylaw
BAIL: The Primary Grounds Strength of the Crown’s Case “The expeditious and sometimes informal nature of a bail hearing may reflect an unrealistically strong case
R v Threefingers, 2016 ABCA 225 is a good case on the inadmissibility of Hearsay evidence. This case illustrates the difficulty courts have in admitting hearsay
R. v. B.P. [2016] O.J. No. 3550 2016 ONSC 4244: Reliability This is a case which addresses addresses issues of hearsay and reliability in a